9/11: Explosive Evidence - Experts Speak Out

Leslie Young (Architect):
When I watched building 7 collapse, it left basically no doubt in my mind. Building 7 had not been hit by a plane. To me it was obvious that there was some controlled demolition and some explosives involved.

Steve Barash (High-rise Architect):
Buildings just don't behave like that.

Robert E. McCoy (High-rise Architect):
Since the mid-sixties i've tried to follow high-rise fires, because they are something we worry a lot about as we design these buildings. And I am not aware of *any* high-rise buildings that have come down as a result of fires. I can't even remember a partial collapse.

[first lines]

Richard Gage (Host, Architect):
Tribute lights in the New York skyline, an annual memorial to the lives lost on 9/11. Yet there is still more light that needs to shine, revealing truths that their family-members deserve to know.

Richard Gage (Host, Architect):
In fact, someone told me recently, "I wouldn't believe what you were telling me even if it were true."

[last lines]

Richard Gage (Host, Architect):
The forensic evidence you have seen is very real. New light has been shone. A third beam now reaches into the pitch-black sky, and stands in for the still officially unexplained free-fall destruction of the WTC Building 7. The obvious dark truth about Building 7 may very well provide the key to justice for the victims of the destruction of the Twin Towers.

Niels Harrit (Chemist):
The three skyscrapers were taken down in a controlled demolition. And all we're asking for is a new investigation and that NIST also will investigate the dust for remaining explosives.

Robert Hopper (Clinical Psychologist):
When your believes are threatened, fear and anxiety are created... Denial, which is probably the most primitive psychological defense, is the most likely to kick in when our believes are challenged.

Frances Shuro (Licenced Professional Counselor):
We need the truth in order to heal.